Gauteng police and the community from various sectors have joined hands to deal and fight the scourge of drugs and substance abuse in the province. The community is responding positively to the call by the Gauteng Provincial Commissioner, Lieutenant G…
Minister Mokonyane to hand over thousands of flush toilets in Dawid Kruiper MunicipalityThe Minister of Water and Sanitation (DWS), Ms Nomvula Mokonyane will hand over thousands of waterborne toilets in the Dawid Kruiper Local Municipality on Friday, 1…
Asalaam Alaikam. I am honored to join all of you here today. I would like to first thank the leaders of the Al-Neelain Mosque for hosting us today and for their gracious hospitality. Many people from different faiths, backgrounds, and cultures have joined us here today to talk about the important work they are undertaking in Sudan to embrace tolerance and further the goal of mutual respect among all citizens.
It was a great privilege to spend time with many of you earlier this morning and to learn about the many ways that interfaith groups are working together to forge a new path forward in Sudan and to move away from divisions based on religion and culture. Our discussion was particularly significant as we continue to build a new relationship between the United States and Sudan. I want you to know that the U.S. government and international community stand with you in this important work.
This is my first visit to your beautiful country. Secretary Tillerson asked me to travel to Khartoum to speak with you and your government about the growing importance of our bilateral relationship. I am here today to underscore one key aspect of that relationship: the shared values of mutual respect, tolerance, and religious freedom.
I would like to share a bit of my own personal history on these topics, as they are central to who I am. I am the grandson of Irish-Catholic immigrants who arrived in Boston, Massachusetts in the 1880s. At the time they arrived � and for many decades that followed � Catholics in the United States faced widespread prejudice based on their religion. When John F. Kennedy � another Catholic from my home state � ran for President of the United States in 1960, he even had to give a prominent speech to reassure the nation that his faith was compatible with the duties of the office of President.
In the United States today, recalling such history seems quaint. But it was not easy, and it took many decades. Eventually divisions were narrowed and mutual understanding between Catholics and Protestants in the United States improved substantially. Today, it is nearly unthinkable that one’s status as a Catholic in the United States would serve as a disadvantage to one’s ambitions for life.
The American experience in this regard underscores that respect for the human dignity of every person � regardless of religious belief or origin � is a key component of not only protecting human rights, but also fostering a society that can flourish, build upon each other’s strengths, and move forward together.
This brings me to one of the purposes of my visit: to make clear that the United States remains deeply committed to positive engagement with Sudan on a wide range of topics � including the protection of religious freedom and the promotion of other human rights throughout your country.
This path of closer engagement is new for both of us.
In 2015, after decades of strained bilateral relations, the United States began a measured engagement with your government to urge greater progress in various peace processes and to seek positive changes for the people of Sudan � regardless of religion, class, or ethnic background.
In June 2016, Sudan and the United States initiated a historic framework for the path forward, the so-called Five Track Engagement Plan.
This plan outlined five priority areas for constructive engagement, and required the Sudanese government to:
1) cease hostilities in conflict regions, including the aerial bombardment in Darfur and the Two Areas of South Kordofan and Blue Nile states;
2) improve humanitarian access throughout Sudan so that aid groups could provide vital resources and assistance needed by the Sudanese people;
3) refrain from interfering in South Sudan and instead play a constructive role in regional peace efforts;
4) cooperate with regional efforts to counter the Lord’s Resistance Army, and;
5) build U.S.-Sudanese cooperation on counter terrorism, and make both of our countries safer.
In each of those five areas, the Government of Sudan has made measureable progress. As a result, last month, the United States formally revoked certain U.S. sanctions on Sudan to open a new chapter in our bilateral relationship.
We hope that these positive developments are emblematic of a positive trajectory for the future of our bilateral relationship. But, we also recognize that completion of the Five Track Engagement Plan is only a first step on a longer road toward fully normalizing our bilateral relations. More hard work is required � from both of our countries.
The United States is eager to see Sudan make progress in a range of areas in the months and years ahead, as we work towards a new framework for bilateral engagement. In short, the closer our countries become, the higher our expectations for Sudan will become.
This engagement will proceed on several fronts. For Sudan to become a full partner of the United States, it must seek peace within its borders and with its neighbors, and cooperate reliably with the international community to improve security and prosperity in the region and adhere to long-standing international norms.
In addition, supporting human rights, including religious freedom, has been, and will continue to be, a critical part of the United States’ bilateral engagement with Sudan.
In the United States, the protection of the basic rights and freedoms of our citizens is fundamental to who we are as a nation. The Bill of Rights in the U.S. Constitution � our foundational legal document � sets forth protections for individual liberties and prohibitions on government power in these realms, including freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and freedom of assembly. These are among our most cherished rights as Americans, and the protection of human rights and the dignity of the individual has served as a key basis of U.S. foreign policy throughout our history.
This history has shown that U.S. partnerships around the world are strongest and most durable with countries that take the necessary steps to protect the same basic human rights and freedoms that are central in the United States.
In the years ahead, one measure of the strength of the U.S.-Sudanese relationship will be improvements in Sudan’s respect for human rights and, in particular, religious freedom. Indeed, one of the reasons I am speaking to you today � at the Al-Neelain Mosque, with Sudanese Muslim and Christian leaders � is to emphasize that the United States cares deeply about religious freedom in Sudan.
By taking steps to enhance protections for religious freedom, the Government will make the entire country more stable and secure.
Interfaith understanding, respect, and the protection of religious freedom and other human rights are bulwarksagainst extremism. Religious tolerance is a building block of peace and security and is the mark of responsible governance. The treatment of members of religious minorities is often the ultimate indicator of a government’s commitment to these values.
When governments favor a specific religious, ethnic, or sectarian group over others, violent radicalism thrives. We also know that governments that sponsor or condone violence against their own people are far more likely to see violent extremism growing in their country.
But by protecting every person’s human rights, society is more just, more free, and more stable for everyone.
For these reasons, we urge the Government of Sudan to protect basic freedoms of expression, peaceful assembly, association, religion, and movement. The United States calls on Sudan to protect political opposition members, human rights defenders, civil society groups, and the media. We also urge the government to hold accountable all who are responsible for human rights abuses.
On the issue of religious freedom, the United States has continued to designate Sudan as a Country of Particular Concern. The State Department’s annual International Religious Freedom Report noted instances of the arrest, detention, and intimidation of religious leaders, and the denial of permits for the construction of new churches; restrictions on non-Muslim religious groups from entering the country; and the censorship of religious material.
During my discussions with senior leaders over the last 6 months, we have welcomed the Sudanese Government’s expressed desire to take steps to overcome its designation as a Country of Particular Concern. However, for that to occur, we must see concrete and demonstrable progress through better policies and improved laws.
We have communicated these steps to the Sudanese Government through a proposed Action Plan, which we hope Sudan will approve and enact. As an immediate confidence-building measure, we have suggested that the Government convene a roundtable with members of religious minority groups about property registration issues, as certain government officials have cited registration issues as the rationale for the demolitions of places of worship. The Government of Sudan, including the Federal States, should also immediately suspend demolitions of places of worship, including churches and mosques.
President Trump, Vice President Pence, and Secretary Tillerson have made clear that the protection and promotion of religious freedom is a foreign policy priority of the Administration. As we move forward in our relationship, the United States will not ignore violations of human rights, including the right to religious freedom.
The United States is ready and willing to assist in these efforts. To that end, we will explore opportunities to work with religious leaders who build bridges through tolerance and interfaith understanding to counter extremism � like those leaders with me here today � while we bring in new voices to further conversations about accountability and inclusive governance.
The United States will also review our people-to-people programs, such as the Young African Leaders Initiative and International Visitor Leadership Program, to identify ways to maximize partnerships and exchanges with the people of Sudan. I am pleased to see so many alumni here this morning as a testament to the success of these programs.
Indeed, we believe that any country-to-country relationship begins on the individual level. We are committed to finding more avenues for Sudanese religious and youth leaders to advance interfaith efforts for peace.
Before I conclude, I also want to touch on a few other important aspects of the U.S.-Sudan relationship.
We recognize that there are ongoing impediments, including certain commercial and financial restrictions, on the bilateral relationship between our countries and a lack of normalized diplomatic relations. Further strengthening of our bilateral relationship will require a renewed commitment by the Government of Sudan on other policies beyond religious freedom.
In particular, while restraint and a cessation of attacks in conflict areas is a positive step forward, we now expect the Sudanese government to move closer to a permanent ceasefire that will create an opening for a truly inclusive political dialogue in Darfur and the Two Areas.
The armed opposition must of course also denounce hostilities and make a commitment to a negotiated peace. All parties who have signed the African Union roadmap must live up to their commitment to engage in dialogue toward a resolution of the conflicts and a comprehensive and inclusive political process, and those who have yet to join the process must do so, as there is no other path to peace and improving the conditions of the people living in the conflict areas. As a first step, the opposition should accept the U.S. proposal to facilitate humanitarian aid in conflict areas across lines to help those who are suffering the most.
Moving forward, we also encourage the Government to improve cooperation with UNAMID � the AU-UN Hybrid Mission in Darfur. UNAMID protects civilians, facilitates humanitarian assistance, and mediates conflict at the local and national level in Darfur.
This mission � which the United States strongly supports � will continue to be instrumental to Sudan’s future and greater collaboration with the UN is a win-win proposition for the people of Sudan.
Violence, war, and ongoing instability are holding Sudan back from a future with great potential. Conflict has affected millions. Hundreds of thousands of Sudanese have been displaced and killed. It is time for a path to reconciliation and peace. Your country’s prosperity and the security of future generations depend on it.
The United States calls on all parties to take this opportunity to define a way forward that will help all of Sudan’s people.
Finally, the United States is also looking for the Sudanese Government to help counter international security threats. In that regard, I very much appreciate and applaud Sudan’s public statements condemning North Korean provocations, and Sudan’s full commitment to compliance with the UN Security Council Resolutions regarding North Korea. Finally, the statements yesterday by the Government of Sudan affirming that it will cut off all ties with North Korea is most welcome.
Let me conclude by noting that I am deeply encouraged by the interactions I have had with the Government and with civil society representatives during my visit here. The religious leaders with whom I met earlier today are a deep source of inspiration. Indeed, there are challenges that lie ahead, but we should all have reason for hope and optimism about the growing engagement between our two countries.
Thank you for your hospitality and kindness. I look forward to many more opportunities to further our goals of a more peaceful and prosperous Sudan � a Sudan that respects the rights of persons of every faith.
Source: U.S Department of State
Gauteng Health MEC Gwen Ramokgopa has instructed that the burial process of the bodies involved in the M1 South incident be stalled for seven days.I have instructed that the burial process be stalled for another seven days to give an opportunity to fam…
CAPE TOWN, The Cabinet has cautioned South African communities to use water more wisely as the levels in the country’s dams remain critical and remain a matter of concern as there is more evaporation than rainfall.Cabinet encourages everyone to play th…
The Portfolio Committee on Police mourns the killing of Constable Jabulani Mavundla stationed at the Mbongolowane police station, KwaZulu-Natal, and the wounding of his colleague.We would like to extend our heartfelt condolences to Constable Mavundla’…
Add U.S. lawmakers to the ranks of those worried the country’s special operations forces are being stretched to a possible breaking point.
Pentagon officials raised the issue months ago, telling lawmakers in May the continuous, heavy reliance on the most elite U.S. forces was threatening to erode their capabilities.
Since then, such concerns have only grown, highlighted by a series of high-profile incidents, including a probe into whether two members of the Navy’s SEAL team may have been involved in the death of an Army Green Beret member in Mali this past June, and the death of four special operation soldiers in an ambush in Niger last month.
“I do worry about overuse of SOF [special operations forces],” House Armed Services Committee Chairman Republican Mac Thornberry said Wednesday at a conference in Washington.
“They are increasingly an organization of choice because SOF is very effective,” he said.
Force of choice
There currently are about 70,000 active duty, reserve and civilian personnel serving under U.S. Special Operations Command. According to Congressional testimony, approximately 8,000 forces are currently deployed to more than 80 countries.
Some of the more high-profile missions include critical roles as part of the effort to defeat the Islamic State (IS) terror group in both Iraq and Syria, as well as assistance to Afghan forces fighting both the Taliban and IS.
Efforts to stem the influence of terror groups in Africa, including the mission in Niger, as well as efforts to reassure U.S. allies in Europe and Southeast Asia, have only increased the need for special operations forces.
“The operational tempo is so incredible,” Senate Armed Services Committee ranking member Democrat Jack Reed said at a policy forum on U.S. special operations forces.
“The idea that you would have within six years, multiple deployments, some people every six months to deploy, that in and of itself causes lots of consequences,” he said.
Some lawmakers fear that even as U.S. special operations forces perform well while they are deployed, the high operational tempo is taking a toll once they return home � with personnel sometimes suffering from physical and emotional scars that cannot be easily identified.
“These men and women are some of the most hardcore, determined people that we have in our armed forces,” said Republican Senator Joni Ernst, a combat veteran who served in Iraq.
“It is very hard for them to step forward and say, ‘Hey, I need to go see the doc. Hey, I need to visit with the counselor,'” she said. “We have to provide more support for those who are engaging in this high op tempo environment.”
Some of the country’s elite forces are starting to get more help.
Ernst said some Navy SEAL teams now have psychologists assigned to their units. Other units are doing more to monitor and detect changes in behavior following deployments.
But she and others worry existing programs are not working well enough, and they say more needs to be done.
“We spend so much time and effort talking about the stuff we’re going buy for the military. I’m not sure over the years we have spent enough time on our most valuable assets, which is our people,” according to Thornberry, who chairs the House Armed Services Committee.
Still, there are nagging concerns the current special operations force may be nearing its limit.
“What they’re capable of is unbelievable, but for how long?” said Representative Adam Smith, the ranking member of House Armed Services Committee. “How many missions can you send them on? How many times can they do this? I think that’s what we don’t know.”
In the meantime, lawmakers expect Washington’s reliance on special operations forces is only going to grow, in part due to an expanding set of global hot spots and also because of a U.S. foreign policy approach that seems to be minimizing the use of diplomacy.
Senator Reed pointed to the U.S. operation in Niger, where four U.S. soldiers were killed, as an example.
“Part of that operation was sort of civic engagement � those special operators were talking to the head person in the village,” he said. “Typically, with adequate security, that’s a State Department function.”
According to Ernst, “We should run the gamut before we are engaging our military and we can’t do that if we don’t have the personnel outside of DoD [the Department of Defense] that are shaping that battlefield for us, shaping that discussion.
“They have to be properly funded. It’s critical to our national security,” she said. “They help our [special forces] operators significantly.”
Another option, according to both Reed and Ernst, is to expand the number of U.S. special operations forces, which they say may be necessary even with a bulked-up diplomatic corps.
“We have to increase numbers and resources,” Reed said, warning, “We cannot sacrifice quality for quantity.”
Source: Voice of America